Oklahoma City is now set to vote on a sales tax to improve their Ford Arena in hopes of luring an NBA team. The sales tax would replace an expiring tax, MAPS for Kids, that has been used to fund public school improvements. (Prior to that there was simply MAPS (Metropolitan Area Projects), which funded parks, trolleys, cultural centers, and sports facilities).
With MAPS for Kids set to expire at the end of ‘08, the city spent the first half of ‘07 taking online feedback from the public regarding what they’d like to see in the MAPS 3 proposal. While far from a scientific poll, the results suggest a gap between the desires of the public and the priorities of the city council. Of the 2,747 suggestions, 1,096 were for street, sidewalk, transit, and trail improvements (with another 117 for beautification of streetscapes); 251 were for parks, amusement parks/fairgrounds, community/youth centers, or amphitheaters; and 81 were for an NBA practice facility or improvements to the Ford Arena. (To be fair, there were 65 votes for a soccer or football stadium, bumping the (presumably) pro sports count up to 146.)
Perhaps sympathy to Chris Van Dyk’s anti-subsidy movement isn’t unique to Seattle. Perhaps it’s not the result of effete coastal urban snobbery, as some have argued.
Sure, maybe the tax will pass in Oklahoma–after all, Bennett & co. have certainly treated their hometown with more respect than they have Seattle. And maybe the city’s unscientific survey is grossly distorted. Maybe those who really want a team didn’t know about it, or don’t have computers. But my guess is that, given the choice, most voters would prefer to see their tax dollars used as something other than seed money for a billionaire’s latest project.